Ask us a question

Please fill in our form and one of our experts will get back to you. Alternatively, call our 24 hour number on:  0113 245 8549

Name is required
Please enter your email address
Please enter your telephone number
Please enter the best time for us to call you
Please enter the details of your enquiry
Please let us know how you heard about us
Please enter the verification code

We’ll only use this information to handle your enquiry and we won’t share it with any third parties. For more details see our Privacy Policy.

  • Our clients
  • Our team
  • Your future
News and Events

Prosecutors admit that pursuing "drink drive" case would not be in the public interest

  • Posted

A bizarre attempt to prosecute a man using 19th century drink-driving legislation has failed.

Sixty-two-year-old Michael Green had staged a protest at his local McDonald’s restaurant after he attempted to go through the drive-thru on a mobility scooter.

Staff at the fast food outlet had refused to serve the defendant on the grounds that he wasn’t driving a vehicle, which triggered a stand-off in which the customer refused to leave.

Police arrived and Green was charged with being “drunk in charge of a carriage” after allegedly refusing to take a breathalyser test.

The legislation cited by officers – the 1872 Licensing Act – is seldom used today and was originally ushered in to help Victorians tackle anyone who attempted to use a carriage, bicycle or steam engine while intoxicated.

When Green, who is registered disabled, appeared before Skegness Magistrates Court last week, prosecutors admitted that pursuing the case would not be in the public interest – particularly since a trial would have cost in the region of £3,000.

Speaking after the hearing, the former HGV driver said: “When the police arrived they tried to breathalyse me but I wasn’t drunk. I just took it out after two seconds.

“They arrested me, put me in a police car and left my mobility scooter at McDonald’s. I was taken to Skegness Police Station where I was kept for two hours. They never breathalysed me in the station and then charged me under this stupid old law.”

If you are charged with a road traffic offence, it is important to seek legal advice at the earliest opportunity to ensure the best possible representation. For further details about how Lester Morrill’s road traffic team can help you, please contact us.